The Humanist Association of Toronto provides a focus of activities and discussion for Humanists in the Toronto area. Please note: HAT events are open to the public, and views expressed do not necessarily represent the official views of the Humanist Association of Toronto. For all public statements, educational events, media enquiries, please contact the webeditor, who will forward your enquiry to our Spokesperson.
___________________________________________
The Humanist Forum meets Saturday morning 11am-1pm
The Monthly Meeting the 2nd or 3rd Saturday at 1:30pm (TBD)
The Steering Committee meets 1st Wednesday, 7pm
The Book Group meets monthly.
___________________________________________
HAT EVENTS | GTA EVENTS | GTA NEWS | HUMANIST NEWS | HAT NEWSLETTER | ETHICAL ACTIONS | UNIV of TORONTO EVENTS

HAT FORUM SAT FEB 8: Hate speech – should we have legal sanctions against it?

H.A.T.  DISCUSSION TOPIC FOR  February 8th, 2014 – Topic Proposer:  Norine Earl

HAT FORUM

DATE: Saturday 8 February
TIME:  11am 
LOCATION: please contact the Coordinator, via the HAT website blog, to determine location

HATE SPEECH – SHOULD WE HAVE LEGAL SANCTIONS AGAINST IT?

Canadians have had four general levels of legal sanctions effecting what we ordinarily call hate speech.
The Charter of Rights, the Criminal Code, The Canadian Human Rights Act (federal) and the provincial and territorial human rights acts.

  1. Should 'truth' be allowed as a defense of hate speech?
  2. What about the defense of religious opinion – what would you wish to live with?
  3. What was the most likely reason(s) for repealing the federal hate speech provision? What, if any, problems do you have their having done that?
  4. Boding well for the survival of the provincial human rights act provisions, the Supreme Court of Canada last year upheld Saskatchewan’s provisions against hate speech where the speech was extreme enough that it was “likely to expose a certain group to unusually strong and deep-felt emotions of detestation and vilification”, but struck provisions against speech tending to “ridicule, belittle or affront the dignity” of a group.  What do you think of their decision to uphold the provision on that basis they did?  What do you think of their decision to strike the provision on the basis they did?
  5. In ordinary civil law (libel) there exists, in addition to the truth of a statement, the defense of a good faith belief in the statement in a matter of public interest. But this does not apply as a defense to hate speech. Should a good faith belief in the statement in a matter of public interest be a defense?
  6. What do you think are the pros and cons, in general, of having hate speech legislation or of abolishing  it?


No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated. We will post relevant comments only. Please send queries to the blog admin.

HAT meetings are free and open to members and the public. Call (416) 966-1361 for location information. ___________________________________________________
The Humanist Forum meets Saturday morning 11am-1pm.
The Monthly Meeting, is usually the second Saturday at 1:30pm; specifics should be found on this blog.
The Steering Committee meets the first Wednesday of each month, at 7pm.
The Book Group usually meets on the first Saturday afternoon of the month.